MODULE 1
A Decoy Is a Controlled Security Claim
Design the relationship among a decoy, its believable placement, the prohibited action, and the evidence a trigger can support.
FREE COURSE / SELF-PACED LEARNING
Learn to interpret decoy triggers, investigate their context and measure deception outcomes in this free security detection course.
Read freely. Create an account to save your completed lessons.
Reading estimates use lesson text and an allowance for diagrams. Reflection, exercises and optional linked resources take additional time. These are estimates, not measured completion times.
KNOW WHAT YOU’RE WORKING TOWARD
Detection practitioners evaluating decoys and high-confidence signals.
Reasoning about deception evidence and measurement. This course does not deploy or operate a live deception platform.
Self-paced reading with explanatory diagrams and linked resources. Reflection and optional resource study take additional time.
Learn how decoys create controlled security claims, why a rare trigger still needs context, and how deception can produce defensible learning without becoming theatre. The course is written for one reader and develops its ideas through continuous explanation, realistic thought experiments, and explicit distinctions between fact, assessment, and uncertainty.
TRY THE REASONING / FICTIONAL SCENARIO
A decoy file is opened once. A scheduled discovery tool was recently enabled, but the event contains an account not normally used by that tool.
State what the decoy proves, identify an alternative explanation and choose a corroborating check before escalating.
The trigger establishes an observed interaction with the decoy under the sensor's assumptions. It does not establish attacker intent. Compare the account, process, schedule and tool configuration with authorized discovery activity. Preserve the unusual account relationship for investigation rather than discarding the event as routine. Measure the useful evidence and decisions produced, not merely a low trigger count.
This example is a reflection exercise, not a scored assessment.
FOLLOW THE LEARNING PATH
MODULE 1
Design the relationship among a decoy, its believable placement, the prohibited action, and the evidence a trigger can support.
MODULE 2
Preserve the chain from decoy creation to trigger and separate the observed interaction from an attribution or intent judgment.
MODULE 3
Evaluate whether decoys answer intelligence questions, reveal control gaps, and produce usable evidence without rewarding activity for its own sake.
BUILD ON THE RIGHT FOUNDATION
These courses address different scopes. Choose the foundation or follow-on that fits your next question.
Reviewed by Threat Intelligence Lab
Sources linked in the lessons provide context and further reading. Check the original documentation for current platform behavior and requirements.
Selected references are shown here; the lessons contain the full reading lists.